Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured, actionable, and concise, with concrete Swift snippets and a sensible workflow. Fleshing out the placement helper functions and tightening checklist/guardrail overlap would lift it further.
Suggestions
Replace the clampToDisplay/zoomToFit/centeredPosition placeholders in the placement snippet with real implementations or a brief inline definition so the example is fully copy-paste runnable.
Consolidate overlapping items between the Review Checklist and Guardrails (e.g., drag-region and restoration guidance) to reduce redundancy and tighten token use.
Add an explicit validate-fix-retry note after the build-run-debug step so the verification loop is unambiguous even though the operation is non-destructive.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, competence-assuming prose with no padding about basic SwiftUI/window concepts; minor redundancy between Guardrails and Review Checklist could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-paste Swift snippets cover the common cases per section, but helper placeholders like clampToDisplay/zoomToFit in the placement example are not fully executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered workflow includes a build-run-debug verification step and a Review Checklist; this is not a destructive/batch operation, so the missing explicit validate-fix-retry loop is a minor gap rather than a cap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with clear headers and a 'When To Use Other Skills' navigation block; no bundle files exist, so appropriately inline content is well-structured with only minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |