Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with executable commands, a clear validated workflow, and clean single-file organization. Its only weakness is minor redundancy between the Usage and Instructions sections that slightly undercuts token efficiency.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicated command-syntax line from the Instructions header since it already appears in the Usage block, linking instead with "as shown above".
Tighten the Panels subsection by moving the deeper detail (synthesis parent semantics, reviewers-summary line) into a referenced file if the skill grows, keeping the inline explanation to the essential rule.
Consider a one-line "Use when..." trigger in the body to complement the When-NOT-to-invoke section and aid routing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with no concept over-explanation, but the command syntax appears redundantly in both the Usage block ("$roborev-review [commit] [--type security|design] [--panel <name>|none]") and the Instructions header, and the Panels subsection is dense. Not a 3 due to this repeat; not a 1 because it assumes Claude's competence and avoids padding. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable commands such as "git rev-parse --verify -- \"$commit^{commit}\"" and "roborev review \"$commit\" --wait [--type <type>]", with concrete examples showing validation, execution, and result presentation. Placeholders are obvious substitutions, making guidance copy-paste ready. Not a 2 because the code is real and complete, not pseudocode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence (Validate inputs → Build and run → Present results → Offer next steps) with an explicit validation checkpoint ("git rev-parse --verify ... || exit 1") and error-recovery guidance for daemon/repo failures. Not a 2 because validation and feedback paths are explicit; not a 1 because the sequence is unambiguous. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single self-contained file with well-organized sections (Usage, When NOT to invoke, Instructions with numbered subsections, Examples, See also) and no nested external references — appropriate for its scope, with no bundle files present to verify. Not a 2 because content is appropriately sectioned rather than a monolithic wall; not a 1 because there are no deep reference chains. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |