Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tightly sequenced, actionable tutoring workflow that assumes Claude's competence and avoids padding with general knowledge. It is well-structured but could tighten the routing prose and add an explicit validation step before mutating LEARNING.md.
Suggestions
Tighten the resume-routing and focused-handoff sections into a compact lookup table to reduce prose while preserving the route-owner logic.
Add an explicit validate-before-write step in Step 4 (e.g., confirm the lesson id and score are well-formed before appending to LEARNING.md) to strengthen the feedback loop.
Consider moving the course-mode routing rules into a short reference file and summarizing the dispatch table inline, improving progressive disclosure for the longer-than-50-line body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence without explaining general concepts, though the resume-routing and handoff sections are dense and could be tightened slightly without losing the routing logic. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance throughout — specific file paths ('phases/<phase-dir>/<lesson-dir>/docs/en.md'), URL template, reply format, and N/M scoring — with only minor gaps around handling malformed quiz.json shapes. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Step 0–Step 5 sequence with validation checkpoints (warm-up recall, quiz verdicts, <70% review threshold, phase Done) and a warm-up feedback loop, though the LEARNING.md writes lack an explicit validate-before-record step. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear section headers and one-level references (URLs, sibling skills), no nested reference chains; the heavier routing tables are inline but reasonably placed for a single-file workflow skill. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |