springboot-patterns

Spring Boot patterns including JPA repositories, REST controllers, layered services, and configuration

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/springboot-patterns/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

80%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a strong, concise Spring Boot pattern reference: lean prose, fully executable idiomatic Java examples, and a useful anti-patterns/checklist section. Its weaker spots are workflow clarity (a static checklist rather than embedded validation feedback loops) and progressive disclosure (a single monolithic file with no external references for deeper detail).

Suggestions

Tie the Checklist into an explicit build/review workflow with validation checkpoints (e.g. "compile and run context-load tests, then re-check N+1 items") to introduce feedback loops and lift workflow clarity to 3.

Split the longer code references (e.g. entity/repository and exception-handler examples) into a references/ file linked from the body with one-level-deep signaled links, improving progressive disclosure.

Keep the current lean prose style intact when adding any navigation pointers to preserve the high conciseness and actionability scores.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and code-forward with minimal prose ("Controllers handle HTTP concerns. Services contain business logic. Repositories handle persistence.") and no re-explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the anchor-3 "lean and efficient; every token earns its place." It is above level 2 because there is no padded or unnecessary explanation to trim.	3 / 3
Actionability	Each section provides complete, idiomatic, executable Java (e.g. the OrderController with @GetMapping/@PostMapping, OrderRepository with @Query/@EntityGraph, GlobalExceptionHandler returning ProblemDetail), which matches anchor-3 "fully executable code/commands; copy-paste ready." It is above level 2 because the code is concrete rather than pseudocode.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	Content is organized by architectural layer and ends with a verification Checklist, but there is no explicit multi-step sequence with embedded validate→fix→retry checkpoints, matching anchor-2 "sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit." It does not reach level 3 because the checklist is a static list rather than feedback loops tied into a workflow.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	Sections are clearly labeled and well-organized, but the skill is a single >50-line monolithic SKILL.md with no references/, scripts/, or assets/ bundle and no one-level-deep references to split detail, matching anchor-2 "some structure but content that should be separate is inline." It is above level 1 (no nested or broken references) but below level 3 (no signaled external references).	2 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Description

57%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly scopes a Spring Boot niche and lists concrete components in proper third-person voice, but it omits an explicit "Use when..." trigger clause and lacks keyword variations, leaving it competent but not maximal. Specificity and trigger quality are mid-tier because components rather than actions and missing variations hold them below level 3.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. "Use when building or reviewing Spring Boot applications involving JPA, REST controllers, or service-layer design."

Broaden trigger terms with natural user phrasings like "Spring", "Spring Data", and "service layer" for better keyword coverage.

Reframe components as concrete actions (e.g. "define JPA repositories", "build REST controllers", "structure layered services") to lift specificity from level 2 to 3.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the Spring Boot domain and several concrete components ("JPA repositories, REST controllers, layered services, and configuration"), but these are pattern categories rather than the concrete actions the anchor-3 example lists, so it stops at level 2.	2 / 3
Completeness	The "what" is present (Spring Boot patterns with named components) but there is no "Use when..." or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which per the judging guidelines caps completeness at 2 rather than 3.	2 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Relevant natural terms appear ("Spring Boot", "JPA repositories", "REST controllers"), but coverage lacks common variations a user might say (e.g. "Spring", "Spring Data", "service layer", "Spring app"), matching the anchor-2 "some relevant keywords but missing common variations."	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The Spring Boot framing is a clear, distinct niche unlikely to trigger for unrelated skills, matching the anchor-3 "clear niche with distinct triggers; unlikely to conflict"; the trailing generic "configuration" does not meaningfully raise conflict risk.	3 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: rohitg00/awesome-claude-code-toolkit
Path: skills/springboot-patterns/SKILL.md
Commit: ebdf1d5

Reviewed: 2 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.