CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

deslop

Remove AI-generated code slop, unnecessary comments, and over-engineering from the current branch diff. Cleans up boilerplate, simplifies abstractions, strips defensive code, and in skill-file mode lints SKILL.md files for quality. Use when cleaning up code, simplifying, removing boilerplate, before committing, or when reviewing a skill before promoting it.

67

Quality

84%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, executable skill: concrete git/test commands, a specific slop catalogue, guardrails, and a validated code-mode workflow. Weaknesses are second-mode support (skill-file mode lacks a workflow and verification), a dangling external reference, and minor duplication between the Trigger, workflow, and Output sections.

Suggestions

Add a short numbered workflow for skill-file mode mirroring the code-mode sequence, ending with a verification step (e.g., re-read the linted SKILL.md to confirm flagged issues were fixed) — the skill's own "premature stop" flag applies to it.

Fix or internalize the reference to `../../rules/skill-conventions.mdc`: the target does not exist in the skill bundle; either inline the needed convention rules or move them to a `references/` file inside the bundle.

Remove duplication: the Trigger section repeats the frontmatter description's "before committing" guidance, and workflow step 6 "Summarise what was cleaned" restates the Output section — keep one source of truth.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly lean, terse bullets with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows ("Casts to `any` used only to bypass type issues", "Three similar lines of code is better than a premature abstraction"). Minor trims remain: the Trigger section duplicates the frontmatter description, and "Summarise what was cleaned" (step 6) overlaps the Output section. Anchor 4, not 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

Copy-paste ready commands ("git diff origin/main...HEAD", "npm test -- --changed --passWithNoTests 2>&1 | tail -10") and a concrete slop catalogue ("renamed `_vars`, re-exports, `// removed` comments"). Minor gaps: no before/after slop-to-clean example, and the test command assumes an npm project. Anchor 4 rather than 5.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Code mode has a clear 6-step sequence with explicit validation ("Re-run `git diff origin/main...HEAD` to verify only slop was removed"; run tests/type-check), but skill-file mode has no sequenced steps or verification — ironic given the skill itself flags "premature stop: cleans but never verifies". Anchor 4, not 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized sections with a single clearly signaled one-level reference ("See [`rules/skill-conventions.mdc`](../../rules/skill-conventions.mdc)"). Minor gaps: that path points outside the skill bundle and the target file is absent from this bundle, and the ~80-line body runs past one screen. Anchor 4; above 3 since the reference is clearly signaled and nothing that belongs in a separate file is inlined.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: concrete, third-person action list plus an explicit "Use when" clause covering both operating modes. The only weakness is trigger breadth — a few common synonyms are missing and the broad cleanup phrasing invites mild overlap with related skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Multiple concrete actions in third person voice: "Remove AI-generated code slop, unnecessary comments, and over-engineering", "Cleans up boilerplate, simplifies abstractions, strips defensive code", "lints SKILL.md files for quality". Matches the comprehensive-coverage anchor; there are no gaps that would drop it to 4.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both questions: the what is the concrete action list, and the when is "Use when cleaning up code, simplifying, removing boilerplate, before committing, or when reviewing a skill before promoting it". Clearly matches the anchor where both what and when appear with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good natural-term coverage ("cleaning up code", "simplifying", "removing boilerplate", "before committing", "reviewing a skill before promoting it") but common synonyms like "diff cleanup", "code review", or "refactor" are absent. Anchor 4 rather than 5; above 3 because the terms present are ones users would actually say.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The AI-slop and skill-promotion-review niche is distinct, but broad triggers like "cleaning up code", "simplifying", and "before committing" overlap with generic simplify/cleanup/commit-review skills, so it is not at the minimal-conflict level of 5.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 1 suspicious

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

rohitg00/pro-workflow

Path

skills/deslop/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.