Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured diagnostic workflow that assumes Claude's intelligence and gives concrete pointers and decision-record conventions. It is strong across all dimensions; the only soft spot is the absence of an explicit error-recovery loop in the workflow, which is advisory rather than destructive so does not warrant a cap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient throughout: terse numbered method, compact guardrails, and a one-paragraph output spec, with no padding that explains concepts Claude already knows. Every section earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Instruction-only skill with concrete, specific guidance ('Reuse `module-map` for the one-screen view,' 'write a decision record in `docs/decisions/NNNN-slug.md`: context, choice, alternatives rejected, why') and enumerated strain patterns; not copy-paste code but actionable per the code-vs-instruction note, with minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence (Map, Find strain, Propose smallest move, Rank by leverage, Record big calls) with checkpoints like pairing with `tdd` and a user-approval gate; the destructive/batch cap does not apply since the skill explicitly forbids code changes, but there is no explicit error-recovery feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, with well-organized Method/Guardrails/Output sections and one-level sibling-skill references (`module-map`, `domain-modeling`, `tdd`); the simple-skill exception applies and no bundle files exist to misorganize. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |