CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

orchestrate

Wire Commands, Agents, and Skills together for complex features. Use when building features that need research, planning, and implementation phases.

73

Quality

66%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/orchestrate/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Orchestrate - Multi-Phase Feature Development

Build features through structured phases with validation gates.

The Pattern

/develop <feature>
  │
  ├── Phase 1: Research (orchestrator agent)
  │   └── Score confidence → GO/HOLD
  │
  ├── Phase 2: Plan (orchestrator agent)
  │   └── Present plan → wait for approval
  │
  ├── Phase 3: Implement (orchestrator agent)
  │   └── Execute plan → quality gates
  │
  └── Phase 4: Review (reviewer agent)
      └── Code review → commit

Usage

When asked to build a feature:

  1. Start with research: Delegate to the orchestrator agent or scout agent to explore the codebase
  2. Wait for GO/HOLD: Don't proceed if confidence is below 70
  3. Present a plan: List all files to change, the approach, and risks
  4. Get approval: Never implement without explicit "proceed"
  5. Implement step by step: Quality gates every 5 edits
  6. Review before commit: Run the reviewer agent on changes

When to Use This

  • Feature touches >5 files
  • Architecture decisions needed
  • Requirements are unclear or complex
  • Cross-cutting concerns (auth, logging, error handling)
  • New patterns not yet established in the codebase

When NOT to Use This

  • Quick bug fixes (just fix it)
  • Single-file changes
  • Well-understood patterns (follow existing code)
  • Documentation-only changes

Agent Selection

PhaseAgentWhy
Researchscout (background, worktree)Non-blocking exploration
Planorchestrator (opus, memory)Deep reasoning, pattern recall
Implementorchestrator (opus, memory)Full tool access
Reviewreviewer (read + bash)Security and quality focus
Debugdebugger (opus, memory)Systematic investigation

Integration with Pro-Workflow

  • Corrections during implementation trigger self-correction loop
  • Quality gates fire at checkpoints via hooks
  • Learnings are captured at the end of each phase
  • Session handoff works across phases
Repository
rohitg00/pro-workflow
Last updated
Created

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.