Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, token-efficient orchestration overview with a clear phase sequence and explicit checkpoints. Its weakness is operational vagueness — thresholds and agent names are given, but the mechanics of delegation, confidence scoring, quality gates, and error recovery are referenced without being defined, leaving Claude to guess how to execute them.
Suggestions
Actionability: replace abstract directives with executable mechanics — show the actual delegation step (e.g., the Agent tool call or command used to launch the orchestrator/scout agent per phase) and define what a 'quality gate' checks (tests, lint, review) so gates every 5 edits are runnable.
Actionability: define the GO/HOLD scoring and the self-correction loop concretely — what factors produce the confidence number and what steps fire when it is below 70 or when a correction occurs mid-implementation.
Workflow clarity: specify the HOLD branch — currently the skill says 'Don't proceed' but never says whether to re-run research, ask the user, or narrow scope.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no padding or explanation of known concepts, but the phase sequence is stated twice (the ASCII "Pattern" diagram and the "Usage" steps), and the Pro-Workflow bullets are thin enough to trim or merge. This redundancy keeps it below anchor 5, though it is well above anchor 3. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete specifics exist ("confidence is below 70", "quality gates every 5 edits", ">5 files", agent names in the selection table) but the mechanics are missing: how to delegate to an agent, how confidence is scored, or what a "quality gate" or "self-correction loop" actually does. As an instruction-only skill its guidance is specific in places but incomplete, matching anchor 3 rather than 4. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence research → GO/HOLD → plan → approval → implement → review → commit is clear with explicit checkpoints (confidence gate, explicit "proceed", gates every 5 edits). Minor validation gaps remain: what to do on HOLD and how error recovery works, since the self-correction loop is named but never specified — keeping it below anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the ~65-line body is organized into clear, navigable sections (pattern, usage, when to/not to use, agent selection). It sits slightly above the 50-line simple-skill carve-out, and the "Integration with Pro-Workflow" section references external concepts (hooks, memory, handoff) without any pointers, so structure is good but not exemplary. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |