Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense but highly actionable state-machine workflow with strong sequencing, validation gates, and good externalization of detail to reference files. The chief weakness is verbosity from repeated guard-failure boilerplate that could be condensed.
Suggestions
Collapse the four repeated 硬约束 paragraphs into one shared 'leaving build requires: isolation, build_mode (+subagent_dispatch), tdd_mode, review_mode — else guard and transition fail' statement.
Move the recommendation-rule tables (branch/worktree, execution mode) into a reference file and keep only the decision-point prompt inline.
Define $COMET_STATE / $COMET_GUARD / $COMET env vars once at the top instead of repeating their full invocation context.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | It avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows and stays operational, but the repeated 硬约束 guard-failure warnings and verbose recommendation-rule tables could be tightened, so it is mostly efficient rather than lean. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It supplies copy-paste-ready commands (node "$COMET_STATE" set ..., git rev-parse HEAD, grep -n '\- \[ \]' tasks.md), concrete file paths, state-field names, and named skills to load. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 0–5 are explicitly sequenced with validation checkpoints (Entry Check, review gate, 50% threshold, build --apply guard), error-recovery feedback loops (debug-gate, re-validate), and a full exit-conditions checklist. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Detailed protocols are externalized to clearly signaled one-level-deep references (comet/reference/debug-gate.md, decision-point.md, context-recovery.md, subagent-dispatch.md, etc.) rather than inlined, keeping the body as orchestration overview. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |