Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a strong, highly actionable workflow with excellent sequencing and validation checkpoints. Its main weaknesses are verbosity from repeated emphasis and a monolithic body that underuses progressive disclosure despite pointing to external references.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the repeated constraints: state the minimal Design Doc frontmatter once and reference it, and consolidate the '禁止手写 summary / 禁止跳过' prohibitions into a single rules block instead of restating per step.
Extract the handoff-file format reference (design-context.json/md and spec-context.json/md field lists) and the brainstorm-summary.md template into a reference file, keeping SKILL.md as an overview that links to them.
Tighten the 1e 主动式上下文压缩 section to a concise rule list; the current prose repeats the recovery-file list already given in 1d.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is actionable and domain-specific rather than explaining basics Claude knows, but it is verbose: prohibitions are repeated, the minimal frontmatter is specified twice (1b and Step 2), and the context-compression sections are wordy and could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable commands (node "$COMET_STATE" check, node "$COMET_HANDOFF" ... --write, node "$COMET_GUARD" ... --apply), concrete file paths, and copy-paste-ready yaml/frontmatter templates with clearly parameterized placeholders. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced steps (0, 1a–1e, 2, 3) with explicit validation checkpoints: entry check, a blocking user-confirmation point at 1c, guard --apply enforcement, and a concrete exit-condition checklist. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Cross-cutting concerns are well-signaled via one-level references (comet/reference/scripts.md, context-recovery.md, decision-point.md, auto-transition.md), but the body is long and monolithic with inline handoff-format and template detail that could be split out; no bundle files are present to verify the referenced paths. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |