Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured triage workflow with strong validation discipline and concrete gh CLI commands. The main gap is the broken/external reference to a maintainer-contract file that is not part of this skill's bundle.
Suggestions
Fix or inline the '../comet-github/references/maintainer-contract.md' reference — it is not present in this skill's bundle, so the opening instruction points to a missing file.
Add a short concrete example of the 'minimal deterministic reproduction boundary' step so the implementation guidance is as actionable as the diagnostic steps.
Consider a brief 'Report format' template to make the '准确报告状态' output shape copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place and it assumes Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable commands (e.g. 'gh pr checks <pr> --json name,state,bucket,link,workflow,startedAt,completedAt' and 'gh run view <run-id> --log-failed') with a useful failure taxonomy, but the local-reproduction guidance stays somewhat abstract. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence for checking remote state is paired with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops — require log evidence, reject stale runs, mark unverified checks, and never claim CI green until the accurate head passes. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well organized into three concise sections and under 50 lines, but the single reference '../comet-github/references/maintainer-contract.md' is external and not present in the bundle, leaving a minor navigation gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |