Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable read-only review workflow with concrete commands, explicit stop/decision checkpoints, and a defined output format, all kept concise and well-organized.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean procedural guidance that assumes Claude's competence — it directs read-only review actions and enumerates exact commands and files without padding or explaining concepts Claude already knows. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides concrete executable commands ("comet status . --json", "comet state get <change-name> phase", "git status --short --untracked-files=all"), specific file paths to read, and a defined output format with severity levels, with only minor conditional gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence (locate → collect context → determine diff → review → output) with explicit decision checkpoints (stale selection stops, multiple changes prompt and stop, ambiguous baseline flagged "审查范围不完整") covers most validation needs for a read-only skill. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is organized into clearly headed sections with appropriately inline material; no bundle files exist so there are no references to mismanage, and the structure keeps navigation straightforward. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |