Conciseness

The body is dense operational prose with no padding and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, fitting 'Efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed'. The continuation-reuse rule ('优先复用 agent.continuation / data.nextAction… 仅在冷恢复、外部状态变化或缺少必要信息时补读') is stated twice (SDK Run 路径 intro and the paragraph after step 4), and steps 1-2 are long run-on sentences that could be tightened, keeping it below anchor 5.

Actionability

The guidance is fully executable with concrete, copy-paste-ready commands and defined placeholders throughout: 'comet classic workspace prepare <name> --isolation <selected-isolation> --json', 'comet guard <change-name> open --apply --approval-hash <approvalHash>', 'comet state propose-escalation <change-name> --reason "<reason>"', 'comet state decide-escalation … --choice <continue|upgrade>', 'comet guard <change-name> build --apply -- <program> [args...]'. This matches anchor 5's 'copy-paste ready code or commands; specific examples cover the common cases' — as an instruction-only orchestration skill, its guidance is maximally actionable.

Workflow Clarity

The SDK Run path gives a clearly numbered Open→Build→Verify→Archive sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (preview then apply with approval hash, re-preview after artifact changes, '--apply 会重新校验当前任务、配置、工作区和证据'), explicit error-recovery loops ('失败后使用返回的当前状态…不重播结果未明的 Action', reconcile recovery), and an escalation decision workflow with user confirmation — matching anchor 5's 'Clear sequence with explicit validation steps; feedback loops for error recovery'.

Progressive Disclosure

Structure is good: the SKILL.md is an orchestration overview that delegates detail to clearly signaled, one-level-deep, section-anchored references ('../comet-classic/reference/sdk-methods.md#阶段入口与恢复', 'reference/compat.md', '../comet/reference/change-walkthrough.md'), matching anchor 4's 'Good structure; most content appropriately placed; references mostly clear'. It falls short of anchor 5 because all referenced files live in sibling skills and none are present in this bundle — including the self-relative 'reference/compat.md' — so reference targets cannot be verified, and steps 1-2 pack several procedures into dense paragraphs that could be better organized.

Specificity

The description names its domain concretely ('使用 Classic 预设流程完成单个 change 的轻量调整' — lightweight single-change adjustments via the Classic preset flow) but offers only one high-level action, matching the anchor 'Names domain and 1-2 concrete actions, but not comprehensive'. It is above anchor 2 because the scope (single change, preset flow, lightweight) is concrete rather than generic, but below anchor 4 because no specific capabilities (e.g., delta specs, guarded build/verify, escalation handling) are enumerated.

Completeness

Both parts are present: 'what' ('完成单个 change 的轻量调整' via the Classic preset flow) and an explicit 'when' clause ('在用户明确调用 /comet-tweak、选择 tweak，或恢复 workflow: tweak 时使用') with concrete trigger phrases. It sits between anchors 4 and 5: the 'when' is fully explicit, but the 'what' is a single high-level action without the concrete capability list of the anchor-5 example, so 4 fits best.

Trigger Term Quality

Triggers are explicit and natural for this skill's invocation model: '明确调用 /comet-tweak、选择 tweak，或恢复 workflow: tweak' covers command invocation, selection, and resume. This fits 'Good keyword coverage; a few natural terms missing' — common phrasings a user might say such as 微调/小改动 (minor tweak) are absent, keeping it below anchor 5's comprehensive synonym coverage.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Triggering is gated on explicit invocation ('用户明确调用 /comet-tweak、选择 tweak，或恢复 workflow: tweak'), creating a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal overlap risk against sibling Comet skills (full classic flow, design, verify, archive). This matches anchor 5; it is not anchor 4 because no plausible mis-trigger path is left open by the explicit-invocation gating.