Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A thorough, highly actionable verification workflow with explicit checkpoints, feedback loops, and concrete state-management commands. Its main weakness is density: repeated safety caveats and inlined operational detail make SKILL.md heavier than an ideal overview.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated safety caveats ('仅在用户确认修复后执行', '禁止跳过此步骤', '必须暂停并等待用户') into a single stated convention referenced where needed, to trim conciseness.
Move the full light/full verification checklists and retry-cap rules into a comet/reference/ file, keeping SKILL.md as a leaner overview that links to them, to improve progressive disclosure.
Reduce duplicated verify-fail transition blocks by stating the command once and referencing it from each failure branch.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and mostly efficient with no padding about concepts Claude already knows, but safety caveats repeat across sections ('仅在用户确认修复后执行', '禁止跳过此步骤', '必须暂停并等待用户') and could be consolidated. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready bash commands throughout (check/scale/transition/set/get subcommands, git diff --stat with base-ref), concrete 6-item and 7-item checklists, and explicit decision protocols cover the common cases fully. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clearly sequenced 0a→0b→1→1b→2a/2b→3→4 flow with explicit validation checkpoints, a verify-fail→build→retry feedback loop, a 3-retry cap, blocking user-decision points, idempotency notes, and a concrete exit-condition checklist. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-signaled one-level-deep references to comet/reference/* and named Superpowers skills make navigation easy, but SKILL.md itself is a long, dense inlined workflow rather than a lean overview pointing to detail files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |