Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, highly actionable planning skill with concrete templates, explicit validation checkpoints, and a self-review feedback loop. Its only mild weakness is a few rationale sentences that could be tightened for token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and directive throughout, assuming Claude's competence, with only minor rationale sentences (e.g. "You reason best about code you can hold in context at once") that could be trimmed; it does not explain concepts Claude already knows. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready plan and task templates with exact file paths, executable test/commit commands, expected output, and a 'No Placeholders' section enumerating concrete red flags — fully executable guidance covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequenced process (Scope Check → File Structure → Task Right-Sizing → … → Self-Review → Execution Handoff) with an explicit Self-Review checklist (spec coverage, placeholder scan, type consistency) and a fix-and-retry feedback loop, plus per-task verification steps with expected PASS/FAIL output. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized with clear headers and easy navigation; there is no bulky reference material that belongs in a separate bundle file, so the inline structure is appropriate, though the plan/task templates are sizeable. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |