CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

rstudio-update-electron

Use when updating the Electron version in the RStudio repository, e.g. bumping to a new release

74

Quality

91%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill body is a tight, executable runbook: concrete commands, exact-pin rationale, the non-obvious allowScripts hand-edit, and validation/stop checkpoints at every risky step. It assumes Claude's intelligence while surfacing only repo-specific knowledge Claude could not infer.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence; the only explanatory prose (e.g. why --save-exact is required, why the allowScripts key must be hand-updated) covers repo-specific gotchas Claude would not already know, so every token earns its place.

5 / 5

Actionability

Each step provides copy-paste-ready commands with explicit placeholders (e.g. `npm install --save-dev --save-exact electron@<NEW_VERSION>`) and concrete verification checks, covering the common cases fully.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Six numbered steps are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (branch check, exit-code confirmation, lockfile presence, `npm test`) and stop-and-report feedback loops on failure, matching the anchor for explicit validation and error recovery.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

This is a single-purpose skill with no need for external references; the body is well-organized into clearly headed sections (Arguments, Steps 1-6), so the simple-skill exception applies and progressive disclosure scores 5 with well-organized sections alone.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Description

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise, third-person, and explicitly pairs a concrete trigger ("Use when...") with the action it performs, sitting in a clearly distinct niche. Its only limitation is naming a single action rather than enumerating the several concrete actions the skill actually performs.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Quotes "updating the Electron version in the RStudio repository" and "bumping to a new release" name the domain and one concrete action, but only a single action is described rather than a comprehensive list.

3 / 5

Completeness

The "Use when updating the Electron version in the RStudio repository" clause gives an explicit, concrete trigger (when) alongside the clear what (updating the Electron version), matching the anchor requiring both with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"updating the Electron version" and "bump to a new release" are natural phrases a user would say, with good keyword coverage though missing a few synonyms like "upgrade" or the literal file "package.json".

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The narrow niche of "Electron version in the RStudio repository" is highly specific with distinct triggers and minimal overlap with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
rstudio/rstudio
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.