Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable and well-sequenced TDD workflow with strong validation feedback loops, though it is verbose in places and bundles reference-style project patterns inline rather than progressively disclosing them via separate reference files.
Suggestions
Move the "Project Patterns Reference" section (handler split, dual-mode, TUI, web API, oplog) into a references/ file (e.g. PROJECT_PATTERNS.md) and link to it from the body to improve progressive disclosure.
Trim the embedded Step 6 runbook markdown template to its essential structure, or relocate the full template into a separate reference file.
Reduce the placeholder-laden file-list bash block in Step 2 to a concise note, since the handler-split table later already conveys the file conventions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and project-specific (handler-split table, bubbletea components, oplog snippet), with minor trimmable prose such as the lengthy embedded runbook markdown template. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready executable Go test code, oplog instrumentation snippet, dual-mode dispatch code, concrete make/go commands, and a full runbook template covering the common implementation cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A 7-step TDD workflow with explicit validation checkpoints (RED "Verify tests fail", GREEN "Verify tests pass", refactor via `make check`) and a 3-strike feedback loop for error recovery. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the ~240-line body is entirely inline; the substantial "Project Patterns Reference" section is reference-style content that could be split into a separate file rather than inlined with no file-level navigation. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |