CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

hive-mind-advanced

Advanced Hive Mind collective intelligence system for queen-led multi-agent coordination with consensus mechanisms and persistent memory

65

0.99x
Quality

48%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

99%

0.99x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/hive-mind-advanced/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

42%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill body is a well-headed but heavily padded monolith: it mixes a genuinely useful CLI command reference with redundant concept explanations, marketing claims, non-executable pseudocode, and a full API reference that belongs in separate files. No validation or verification steps appear in any workflow, and the absence of any bundle structure means progressive disclosure rests entirely on inline organization. The core content is salvageable but needs roughly half the tokens moved to reference files or deleted.

Suggestions

Move the API Reference (HiveMindCore, CollectiveMemory, HiveMindSessionManager), the Configuration section, and the extended Examples into a references/ file, leaving SKILL.md as a concise overview with one-level-deep pointers.

Delete sections that explain what Claude already knows (the Majority/Weighted/Byzantine plain-language explanations, repeated consensus descriptions) and drop unverifiable benchmark claims and comment-only code blocks.

Fix the JavaScript examples to be executable (correct the invalid 'priority: 8' argument syntax, show how hiveMind/memory are constructed or imported) and add validation steps after risky operations — e.g. run 'hive-mind status' after spawn to confirm workers are active before proceeding.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

At ~730 lines, the body is noticeably verbose with several padded or unnecessary sections: it explains concepts Claude already knows ('Simple voting where the option with most votes wins', a plain-language Byzantine fault tolerance explanation), explains the same consensus algorithms three times (Core Concepts, Consensus Building, Configuration comments), includes marketing benchmarks ('10-20x faster batch spawning', '84.8% SWE-Bench solve rate'), and contains code blocks that are only comments ('// Automatic - no configuration needed', '// Automatic pattern learning...'). It avoids anchor 1 only because a substantial core of genuinely useful command reference remains amid the padding.

2 / 5

Actionability

The bash CLI examples are concrete and executable ('npx claude-flow hive-mind init', 'spawn ... --queen-type strategic'), but much of the JavaScript guidance is pseudocode rather than executable code: 'hiveMind.createTask(\'Implement user authentication\', priority: 8, { estimatedDuration: 30000 })' is invalid JS syntax, and the earlier examples use 'hiveMind' and 'memory' objects before any import or construction is shown. This matches the anchor for 'some concrete guidance but incomplete; pseudocode instead of executable code'.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear sequence exists (Getting Started: init → spawn → status/metrics, plus a Beginner→Intermediate→Advanced progression), which places it above anchor 2. However, no workflow includes validation checkpoints: after spawning a swarm there is no step to verify workers spawned correctly, and session pause/resume/checkpoint flows never show checking the result. Batch agent-spawning workflows without verification steps cap workflow clarity at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist (no references/, scripts/, or assets/), so everything — the full HiveMindCore/CollectiveMemory/SessionManager API reference, complete config object walkthroughs, and multiple extended example sections — is inlined in a monolithic 730-line SKILL.md. Section headers are clear and external doc links are listed at the end, matching 'some structure but could be better organized; content that should be separate is inline', but the API reference and configuration detail clearly belong in one-level-deep reference files.

3 / 5

Total

11

/

20

Passed

Description

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description communicates a clear domain and distinct identity, but reads as a feature list with buzzword leanings ('Advanced', 'collective intelligence system') rather than an actionable capability statement. Its biggest structural gap is the absence of any 'Use when...' trigger clause, which caps completeness and weakens trigger-term quality. Adding an explicit when-to-use clause with natural user phrasings would lift two dimensions at once.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause, e.g. 'Use when coordinating multiple agents on a shared objective, spawning swarms, or reaching consensus across agents' — this raises both completeness and trigger_term_quality.

Convert feature nouns into concrete actions, e.g. 'Spawns queen-led agent swarms, builds consensus among workers, and persists collective memory across sessions'.

Trim buzzwords ('Advanced', 'collective intelligence system') and include natural user synonyms like 'swarm', 'queen/worker agents', and 'spawn' to sharpen trigger terms.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ('Advanced Hive Mind collective intelligence system for queen-led multi-agent coordination') and lists concrete features — 'consensus mechanisms and persistent memory' — but uses almost no action verbs, presenting feature nouns ('queen-led coordination', 'consensus mechanisms') rather than the concrete actions anchors reward. It sits above anchor 2 (domain named, generic actions) because three specific capabilities are named, but below anchor 4, which expects several listed actions with only minor gaps.

3 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clearly stated (queen-led multi-agent coordination with consensus and persistent memory), but there is no 'Use when...' clause or any equivalent explicit guidance about when to invoke the skill. Per the judging guidelines, a missing 'Use when...' clause caps completeness at 3, which is exactly the 'clear what, missing/weakly-implied when' anchor.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Relevant keywords exist — 'Hive Mind', 'multi-agent coordination', 'queen', 'consensus', 'swarm-adjacent terms' — and a user working with claude-flow hive-mind would plausibly say 'hive mind' or 'multi-agent coordination'. However, common variations and natural phrasings ('spawn a swarm', 'worker agents', 'collective memory') are missing and there is no explicit trigger phrasing, matching the anchor for 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms'.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Hive Mind' and 'queen-led' naming carve a fairly distinct niche with low conflict risk against unrelated skills, matching the 'mostly distinct' anchor. It falls short of 5 because adjacent coordination skills (swarm orchestration, general multi-agent coordination) share overlapping trigger territory with terms like 'multi-agent coordination' and 'consensus'.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

skill_md_line_count

SKILL.md is long (730 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
ruvnet/RuVector
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.