Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary lean skill body: copy-paste-ready commands for every hardware modality, explicit expected outputs acting as validation checkpoints, and tight non-obvious constraint notes. The only gap is the absence of error-recovery guidance when device discovery or a read fails.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient throughout: every line is a command, a non-obvious constraint ('A cloud agent cannot see your USB ports', 'The UDP capture cannot share port 5005 with a running sensing server'), or expected-output detail; nothing explains concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands with real flags for every device ('ruview mmwave --port <p> --model mr60bha2', 'hosts run --host lab-pi --tool ruview_mmwave_read --args-json {"port":"/dev/ttyUSB0"}'); device-specific values appear as standard CLI placeholders, and common cases per modality are all covered. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered sequence (find devices → read modality → remote hosts) with explicit checkpoints via the 'Confirms' column ('chip id; CSI callbacks in the serial log', 'valid frames, checksum errors') and the host-key pinning step. Not a 5: no error-recovery guidance for failure cases (e.g., doctor finds no device), a minor validation gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, and well-organized into clean sections with no external references needed; the body references no bundle files, meeting the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |