Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-organized review checklist with a concrete reference command and clear scope boundary, scoring highly across conciseness and progressive disclosure with only minor actionability and workflow-clarity gaps.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Each line is a terse, unpadded directive (e.g., "Restore registries before recorder states and keep limits bounded") with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor; not below 5 because every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Step 1 gives a concrete command ("Read `homecore-server --help` and ADR-161") and the remaining steps are specific, actionable directives appropriate to a plan-review skill; not a 5 because most steps lack copy-paste commands to verify each criterion, and not a 3 because the guidance is concrete rather than pseudocode-level. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered 1-6 sequence is clear and each item functions as a review checkpoint, with the closing line "This skill reviews a plan. It does not start the server." setting an explicit boundary; not a 5 because there is no explicit validate/feedback loop, and not a 3 because the sequence and per-step checks are well defined. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | At under 50 lines with no need for bundle files (none exist in references/scripts/assets) and a clear title plus well-organized numbered list, this matches the simple-skill exception allowing a 5 with just well-organized sections; ADR-161 is appropriately referenced inline rather than nested. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |