CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

agent-user-tools

Agent skill for user-tools - invoke with $agent-user-tools

37

2.80x
Quality

7%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

84%

2.80x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./.agents/skills/agent-user-tools/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

14%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill reads more like a marketing brochure or role description than actionable technical guidance. While the tool invocation examples provide some concrete value, the majority of the content is verbose, aspirational feature lists and quality standards that waste tokens without helping Claude perform specific tasks. The skill lacks workflows, validation steps, error handling, and any form of progressive disclosure.

Suggestions

Remove all aspirational/descriptive sections ('Advanced features you leverage', 'User experience optimizations you implement', 'Quality standards') and replace with concrete workflows showing when and how to use each tool.

Add step-by-step workflows with validation checkpoints for key operations like storage uploads (e.g., verify bucket exists, upload, confirm URL generation) and subscription management (e.g., subscribe, verify connection, handle cleanup).

Provide specific examples of common user requests mapped to exact tool invocations with expected inputs and outputs, rather than generic function signatures.

Trim the persona/role description to 1-2 sentences and focus the remaining token budget on actionable, executable guidance.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Extremely verbose with extensive lists of features, quality standards, and optimizations that Claude already knows or that are purely aspirational descriptions rather than actionable instructions. Sections like 'Advanced features you leverage' and 'User experience optimizations you implement' are padded marketing-style content with no operational value.

1 / 3

Actionability

The tool invocation examples are concrete and show actual function signatures with parameters, which is useful. However, much of the content is descriptive rather than instructive—it lists capabilities and quality standards without providing executable workflows or specific guidance on when/how to use each tool in practice.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

There is no clear multi-step workflow or sequencing. The numbered 'user support approach' list describes categories of work, not steps to follow. There are no validation checkpoints, error handling guidance, or feedback loops for operations like storage uploads or subscription management that could fail.

1 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The content is a monolithic wall of text with no references to external files and no clear hierarchy. All content is dumped inline with no navigation structure, and there are no bundle files to support progressive disclosure.

1 / 3

Total

5

/

12

Passed

Description

0%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is an extremely weak description that fails on every dimension. It provides no information about what the skill does, when it should be used, or what distinguishes it from other skills. It reads more like a label than a description.

Suggestions

Replace the entire description with concrete actions the skill performs, e.g., 'Executes user-facing tool operations such as [specific action 1], [specific action 2], [specific action 3].'

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger terms that describe scenarios or user requests that should activate this skill.

Include specific keywords and file types or domains this skill covers to distinguish it from other agent skills and reduce conflict risk.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description provides no concrete actions whatsoever. 'Agent skill for user-tools' is entirely vague and abstract, giving no indication of what the skill actually does.

1 / 3

Completeness

Neither 'what does this do' nor 'when should Claude use it' is answered. The description only states it's an 'agent skill' and how to invoke it, with no explanation of purpose or trigger conditions.

1 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

There are no natural keywords a user would say. 'user-tools' is generic jargon, and '$agent-user-tools' is an invocation command, not a trigger term. No common user language is present.

1 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'User-tools' is extremely generic and could overlap with virtually any skill that involves user-facing tools. There is nothing distinctive about this description.

1 / 3

Total

4

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
ruvnet/claude-flow
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.