Content
25%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exhaustive but non-executable command dump: malformed URLs/paths prevent copy-paste use, destructive and batch operations lack validation checkpoints, and nothing is split into reference files. It needs executable commands, a sequenced workflow with validation, and progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Fix the malformed URLs and paths throughout (every '$' used as a path separator should be '/'), and verify each 'npx ruv-swarm github ...' subcommand actually exists before presenting it as executable.
Add an ordered quick-start workflow with explicit validation checkpoints (e.g. 'gh auth status' pre-check, dry-run before board-bulk/cross-org-sync, verify sync result before declaring done) for the destructive and batch operations.
Split the large reference material (full board-mapping YAML, view/dashboard configs, the analytics pipeline) into files under references/ and link to them from a concise SKILL.md overview; create the files referenced by the 'See also' links or remove those links.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a ~470-line catalog of near-duplicate 'npx ruv-swarm github board-*' command blocks; while not conceptually over-explaining, the redundancy and volume make it noticeably padded and token-inefficient. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Commands appear concrete but are not copy-paste executable: URLs and paths use a corrupted '$'-for-'/' substitution (e.g. 'https:/$api.example.com$github-sync', '.github$board-sync.yml', '.github.com$GITHUB_REPOSITORY$issues'), and several ruv-swarm/claude-flow subcommands are unverifiable. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Features are grouped but there is no sequenced multi-step workflow with validation checkpoints, and destructive/batch operations (board-recover, cross-org-sync, board-bulk) lack validation; per the rubric cap this cannot exceed 3, and the rough-sequence-with-no-validation fit is closest to 2. | 2 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | It is a single monolithic SKILL.md with no bundle files, content that belongs in separate reference files is inlined, and the inline 'See also' links point to nonexistent files (swarm-issue.md, multi-repo-swarm.md), matching 'content that clearly belongs in separate files is inlined'. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 8 / 20 Passed |