CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

agent-raft-manager

Agent skill for raft-manager - invoke with $agent-raft-manager

55

0.96x
Quality

34%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

90%

0.96x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.agents/skills/agent-raft-manager/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is agent-raft-manager in ruvnet/claude-flow

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

40%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-organized but purely conceptual overview of Raft: it describes what the algorithm does rather than giving Claude executable steps, code, or validation checkpoints. Structure is decent, but actionability and workflow clarity are weak.

Suggestions

Replace conceptual bullets with concrete, executable guidance — e.g. actual commands/scripts for triggering an election or appending entries — so the skill instructs rather than describes.

Add a sequenced workflow with explicit validation checkpoints (e.g. verify log consistency after replication before declaring commit) for the destructive/batch operations like membership changes.

Remove or relocate the embedded raft-manager agent YAML block so the markdown body opens cleanly with the skill overview, and trim the explanations of well-known Raft concepts.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly terse bullets but spends tokens explaining Raft mechanics Claude already knows (randomized timeouts, heartbeats, append entries, snapshotting), fitting "mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened"; not a 2 because it is bullet form rather than padded prose.

3 / 5

Actionability

Guidance is high-level hints ("Implement append entries protocol", "Track commit index and apply entries") with no executable code, commands, or specific steps, matching "minimal concrete guidance; high-level hints but missing the specific steps to execute"; not a 1 because it names concrete Raft mechanisms rather than being fully generic.

2 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Only a rough conceptual ordering (election, replication, fault tolerance) is present with no executable sequence, no validation checkpoints, and no feedback loops, matching "rough sequence present but many gaps; validation absent".

2 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is under 50 lines with clear H1/H2/H3 sectioning and no external references are needed, scoring well on the simple-skill exception; held at 4 rather than 5 because the unexplained embedded agent-config YAML block at the top of the body is a minor organization oddity.

4 / 5

Total

11

/

20

Passed

Description

28%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is a thin label-plus-invocation string that names the domain but tells Claude neither what the skill concretely does nor when to use it, relying on the skill name alone for triggering. It is below the midpoint on specificity, trigger quality, and completeness.

Suggestions

Rewrite the description to list concrete actions, e.g. "Manages Raft consensus: runs leader election, replicates logs, and verifies cluster consistency."

Add an explicit "Use when..." trigger clause naming natural user phrases such as "Raft consensus", "leader election", or "log replication".

Drop the "invoke with $agent-raft-manager" invocation mechanics from the description; invocation is handled elsewhere and adds no trigger value.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description "Agent skill for raft-manager - invoke with $agent-raft-manager" names the raft-manager domain but states zero concrete actions (no mention of leader election, log replication, or consensus), matching the anchor "Names the domain but actions are minimal or generic".

2 / 5

Completeness

The "what" is vague ("Agent skill for raft-manager") and there is no "Use when..." clause — only invocation mechanics ("invoke with $agent-raft-manager"), so it has a vague what and no real when, matching anchor 2 and capped below 3 by the missing trigger guidance.

2 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It surfaces only the skill name keyword "raft-manager" and an invocation token; the natural phrases a user would actually say (consensus, leader election, log replication) are absent, fitting "one or two generic keywords; missing the natural phrases users say".

2 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The raft-manager niche is fairly specific and the named trigger is distinct, but the bare description does not articulate differentiating triggers, leaving moderate overlap risk with related consensus/distribution skills.

3 / 5

Total

9

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
ruvnet/ruflo
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.