Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-organized instruction body that correctly points to an existing bundled script. It loses points for omitting the concrete command to invoke that script and for lacking explicit validation checkpoints in its workflow.
Suggestions
Add the exact invocation command, e.g. 'Audit: Run `node scripts/audit.js <url>` to check the endpoint status.'
Include a lightweight validation/checkpoint step, such as confirming a non-2xx status triggers the Report step before proceeding to the Secure reminder.
Specify expected output interpretation (e.g. what a HEAD timeout vs. a 5xx means) so the Report step is more concrete.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | A lean six-line body that assumes Claude's competence and explains no background concepts; every line directs an action, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It references a real bundled script ('scripts/audit.js') but never shows the invocation command (e.g. 'node scripts/audit.js <url>'), leaving a key execution detail missing per the 'incomplete, missing key details' anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Three steps are clearly sequenced (Audit, Report, Secure) but there are no validation checkpoints or feedback loops, matching the 'steps listed but validation gaps' anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, well-organized with labeled steps, and the single bundle reference ('scripts/audit.js') is real and one level deep, satisfying the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |