Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplar of lean, actionable skill authoring: dense tables, executable commands, a sequenced diagnostic workflow with a feedback loop, and a clean one-level reference structure with all bundle paths verified to exist. The only minor gap is that in-workflow validation checkpoints are implied rather than explicitly gated.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and information-dense — a compact states table, a numbered diagnostic procedure, and two code blocks — with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides two copy-paste-ready deno commands with flags and arguments and a concrete seven-step diagnostic procedure with specific, executable actions ('Read 3 random recipes', 'Skim headings only', 'Read the first sentence of each paragraph'). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Diagnose section is a clear sequenced checklist culminating in prioritization ('Pick the one most useful state. Fix that state first') and an explicit end-of-session feedback loop ('Did this help?'), but mid-process validation checkpoints are implicit rather than gated. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A concise overview points to seven well-signaled, one-level-deep bundle paths (five references + two scripts) via blockquote 'load ...' lines; all referenced files exist and no reference points to another reference, so navigation is clean and shallow. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |