Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, mostly lean router that points to real one-level-deep reference files and gives concrete placement and output guidance. Its main gap is that build/verify validation is mentioned as context rather than sequenced as an explicit workflow checkpoint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — no padding about what docs are — with only minor redundancy (the Scalekit/docs-engineering exclusion is restated at lines 38 and 126) that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete executable guidance: a decision table mapping reader goals to file paths, a copy-ready frontmatter output block, and explicit placement-map file pointers; minor gaps such as a worked sidebar-label example keep it just short of fully copy-paste ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is clear — classify intent, branch (placement first, then the other), produce the output plan, then adapt — but validation steps (search-index regeneration, verifying a clean build) appear as facts inside the API branch rather than as explicit ordered checkpoints with a fix-and-retry loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | It is a clear overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references via blockquote '> Load references/...', and all six referenced files (api-reference-flow.md, placement-decisions.md, scalekit-placement-map.json, integration-guide-template.md, screenshot-workflow.md, _template-placement-map.json) exist in the bundle, so navigation is easy and content is appropriately split. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |