Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable overview that splits detail into real one-level-deep references and supplies a concrete review output format. Its only slack is a brief conceptual "Core principle" paragraph that could be trimmed.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean with dense, concrete rules, but the "Core principle" paragraph ("Documentation voice is a contract with the reader... makes readers confident the information is accurate") over-explains a concept Claude already grasps, keeping it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Each mode has concrete numbered steps, an exact copy-paste output template (PASS/FAIL/WARN with grouping and a single top fix), and specific rules with before/after examples — fully actionable guidance for an assistive instruction skill. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Both modes are clearly sequenced (handoff: 3 steps; review: 5 steps with priority grouping and a closing top-fix), and the "Did this help?" section is a user feedback loop; it is not 5 because there is no internal validate→fix→retry checkpoint, though none is required for this non-destructive skill. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that signals one-level-deep references via `> Load ...` blockquotes, and all four referenced files (style-principles, scalekit-style-prompt-block, llms-judge-rubric, _template-style-prompt-block) exist in references/, giving clear navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |