Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, actionable diagnostic skill that splits detailed reference material into a one-level-deep bundle file and provides concrete rules, worked examples, and a defined procedure. The only relative gaps are minor conciseness trim opportunities and the absence of an explicit retry feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and domain-specific with no padding of concepts Claude already knows, but sections like example prompts and the "Did this help?" meta block could be trimmed, keeping it just below fully lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance throughout: an 8-row label-rules table with worked examples ("Test users" → "Run end-to-end tests", slug rename example), a defined 6-step diagnostic procedure, and a structured output table, covering common cases for an instruction-only skill. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The "Diagnostic process" is a clear 6-step numbered sequence with checkpoints (preview test in step 5, leaf-vs-title drift check in step 6), but it lacks an explicit fix-and-revalidate feedback loop, leaving a minor validation gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clear overview with a well-signaled, one-level-deep reference (`references/fsa-sidebar-journey.json`, cited as both a structured reference and a checklist); the detailed journey structure is appropriately split into that file rather than inlined. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |