journey-sidebar-labels
Audit and design documentation sidebar labels and section order so navigation follows a clear developer journey — concise labels, sentence case, and phase-aligned groups (reference model: Full stack auth sidebar in Scalekit developer-docs).
62
72%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/documentation/journey-sidebar-labels/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
67%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description is strong on specificity and distinctiveness, clearly defining a narrow task around documentation sidebar design with concrete conventions (sentence case, phase-aligned groups, concise labels). However, it lacks an explicit 'Use when...' clause, which limits completeness, and the trigger terms are somewhat specialized, potentially missing natural user phrasings for when they need sidebar/navigation help.
Suggestions
Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause, e.g., 'Use when the user asks about reorganizing documentation navigation, sidebar structure, or menu labels in developer docs.'
Include more natural trigger terms users might say, such as 'docs navigation', 'sidebar structure', 'menu organization', 'table of contents', or 'information architecture'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: audit sidebar labels, design section order, enforce concise labels, sentence case, phase-aligned groups. Also references a specific model (Scalekit developer-docs). | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | The 'what' is well-covered (audit and design sidebar labels and section order with specific conventions), but there is no explicit 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance telling Claude when to select this skill. | 2 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Contains relevant terms like 'sidebar labels', 'section order', 'navigation', 'developer journey', 'documentation', and 'sentence case', but misses common user phrasings like 'docs navigation', 'sidebar structure', 'menu organization', or 'information architecture'. The reference to 'Scalekit developer-docs' is very niche and unlikely to be a natural trigger. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | This is a very specific niche — documentation sidebar navigation design with a particular style convention and reference model. It is unlikely to conflict with other skills due to its narrow focus on sidebar label auditing and developer-docs navigation ordering. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted instructional skill with strong actionability and workflow clarity. The label rules table, journey phases model, and diagnostic process give Claude concrete, executable guidance for auditing sidebar structures. The main weaknesses are moderate verbosity (the 'Did this help?', 'Example prompts', and 'What you do not do' sections consume tokens without proportional value) and an unverifiable external reference file.
Suggestions
Remove or significantly trim the 'Did this help?', 'Example prompts', and 'What you do not do' sections — these consume tokens without adding actionable guidance Claude needs.
Include the `references/fsa-sidebar-journey.json` file in the bundle so the reference model is actually available, or inline the essential structure directly in the skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is mostly efficient and well-structured, but includes some unnecessary elaboration. The 'What you do not do' section, 'Example prompts', and 'Did this help?' sections add tokens without much actionable value. The core content (label rules table, journey phases, diagnostic process) is well-organized but could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides highly concrete, actionable guidance: a clear rules table with specific examples, an ordered diagnostic process with explicit checks, a structured output format (table), and specific patterns like 'Quickstart: <Name>'. The diagnostic steps are precise enough to follow without ambiguity. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 6-step diagnostic process is clearly sequenced and each step includes a validation question (e.g., 'does this read as a timeline?', 'Can a reader predict the page's purpose from this label alone?'). The output format provides a clear deliverable structure. For a non-destructive advisory skill, this level of workflow clarity is excellent. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill references `references/fsa-sidebar-journey.json` as a supporting file, but no bundle files are provided, making it impossible to verify the reference exists or is useful. The content itself is well-sectioned with clear headers, but the reference model section inlines content that could be in the referenced JSON, and the 'Did this help?' and 'Example prompts' sections could be separated or omitted. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Repository
- saif-shines/devex-kit
- Commit
b683754
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.