Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-structured diagnostic skill: concrete rules with worked examples, a clearly sequenced audit process with built-in checks, and an appropriately referenced one-level-deep data file. The main cost is token efficiency: two non-operational sections and a restated rule could be trimmed without losing capability.
Suggestions
Cut or compress the "Example prompts" and "Did this help?" sections, or move them behind the reference file: they add ~12 lines of context without executable guidance.
Remove the duplicated specificity rule: diagnostic step 5 restates the "could plausibly name 3+ different pages" rule already given in the label-rules table; a back-reference ("apply the specificity rule") suffices.
Trim narrative overlap in "Reference model: Full stack auth (Scalekit)", whose journey-chain example largely duplicates the journey-phases ordering already specified.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The core rules are lean and table-based, but ~12 lines of non-operational sections ("Example prompts", "Did this help?") add little executable value, and the specificity rule is stated twice (table row "Avoid bare-noun labels... could plausibly fit 3+ different guides" and diagnostic step 5 repeats it nearly verbatim). Not 4 because the trimming opportunities exceed minor over-explanation; not 2 because nothing teaches concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout: before/after relabel examples ("Test users" → "Run end-to-end tests"), a rename pattern (test-users.mdx → run-e2e-tests.mdx), a defined "Quickstart: <Name>" pattern, a 6-step diagnostic process, and a specified output table format. As an instruction-only skill, the absence of code is not penalized and the guidance fully covers the common audit cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The diagnostic process is a clearly sequenced 6-step list with embedded validation checkpoints (step 5 "Preview test", step 6 leaf-vs-title drift check) and a designated checklist ("Use references/fsa-sidebar-journey.json as a checklist"). The skill is a read-only diagnostic, so no destructive/batch validation cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and the detailed sidebar structure data is appropriately split into a real, existing one-level-deep reference (references/fsa-sidebar-journey.json) that is clearly signaled at both mention points with its intended use ("as a checklist when auditing another product sidebar"). Not 4 because there are no organization gaps: navigation is easy and the split is clean. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |