Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured instruction skill: dense actionable rules, explicit phase gates with validation checkpoints, and clean one-level-deep references to real bundle files. The only weakness is the near-total absence of concrete code/schema examples, which keeps actionability just below the top anchor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, directive bullets with no padding or re-explanation of MCP concepts Claude already knows; the phase table and 'Done when' lines earn every token. Minor repetition between phase gates and the checklist does not rise to over-explanation. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, executable rules ('Name tools verb_noun ... <= 64 characters', 'Make every handler async', 'Return recoverable errors with isError: true and a next step') with no vagueness, but as an instruction-only skill it includes almost no runnable code or CLI commands and no concrete schema example, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear Design->Build->Harden->Test sequence with explicit 'Done when' gates, a Phase gates section of validation checkpoints, and a Quality checklist; boundary validation and isError recovery give the feedback-loop structure the rubric rewards. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Overview body signals three one-level-deep references via blockquote 'load references/X.md' at the start of each relevant phase; all referenced files (tool-design.md, build.md, security-and-testing.md) exist and the detail/split is appropriate, making navigation easy. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |