Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is appropriately short and well-organized for a simple skill, but its guidance is not actionable: the test-running step has no actual command, verification is unspecified, and the `echo hello` code block is a placeholder unrelated to the workflow. The dangling 'MUST follow the rubric' instruction also adds noise without informational value.
Suggestions
Replace 'Run the test suite' with the actual executable command (e.g. the specific test runner invocation for doraval) so the step is copy-paste ready.
Make 'Verify the output' concrete: state what output to expect, what 'passing' looks like, and what to do when a check fails (a validate -> fix -> retry loop).
Either connect the `echo hello` code block to the actual workflow or remove it, and drop the 'MUST follow the rubric / MUST NOT skip steps' lines that reference material not present in the skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is very lean with no concept over-explanation, but 'MUST follow the rubric. MUST NOT skip steps.' references an external rubric not present in the skill, and 'Ensure all checks pass' restates step 2 — minor tokens that could be trimmed. Anchor 4 ('minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed') fits better than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The real steps are high-level hints: 'Run the test suite' gives no command, suite name, or entry point, and 'Verify the output' is vague. The only executable code (`echo hello`) is a placeholder unconnected to the task, matching anchor 2 ('minimal concrete guidance; high-level hints but missing the specific steps to execute') rather than 3. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A rough sequence exists (run tests, then verify output) and 'Ensure all checks pass' implies a checkpoint, but steps lack executable detail and validation is implicit only. This matches anchor 3 ('steps listed but validation gaps; checkpoints missing or implicit'), not 4 which requires concrete commands per step. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, and needs no external references; content is organized into a heading, numbered step list, note, and code block. Per the simple-skill scoring note, well-organized short content with no needed references scores 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |