Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary lean, fully actionable skill body: copy-paste-ready commands, an explicit validation and fallback stage, and a strict output template. The sole defect is the reference link, whose ../../ path escapes the skill bundle and does not resolve to an existing file.
Suggestions
Fix the reference link to point inside the skill bundle (e.g., [references/CLI_REFERENCE.md](references/CLI_REFERENCE.md)) instead of ../../references/CLI_REFERENCE.md, and ensure the references/ directory with that file actually ships with the skill.
Make the consult command's question argument an obvious placeholder (e.g., "<question>") or add a one-line note that the sample Rust question is a stand-in, so the command cannot be copy-pasted with the example question verbatim.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~40-line body is lean throughout: steps are one-line directives ("Verify provider availability using `quintet doctor` if pool status is unknown") with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows and no padding. Every token earns its place, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The skill provides a fully executable copy-paste bash one-liner including binary-path fallback resolution, a concrete readiness command (`quintet doctor`), and a strict verbatim output template. This matches the fully-executable anchor covering the common case; the embedded sample question ("Best approach to dedupe a 10M-row stream in Rust?") serves as a concrete example. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step workflow has an explicit validation/fallback stage ("Verify responses were collected from ready models", "If a provider times out or errors, log the failure and synthesize from available responses", "If zero providers respond, prompt user to check CLI auth") plus a strict deliverable format. Clear sequence with explicit validation and error-recovery feedback loops matches the top anchor; the operation is read-only so no destructive-operation cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is good: a concise overview, a Reference Materials section with a single clearly-signaled one-level reference for the bulk CLI detail. It falls short of 5 because the link path "../../references/CLI_REFERENCE.md" points two directory levels up — outside the skill bundle where a relative "references/CLI_REFERENCE.md" would be expected — and no references/ bundle directory is present alongside the skill, so navigation to the referenced file is broken. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |