Quick-action skill to run a two-round cross-model debate across ready AI provider CLIs (Claude, Codex, Antigravity, Copilot, Qwen, OpenCode) and synthesize a converged verdict. Use when resolving contested decisions via /debate.
78%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
Passed
No findings from the security scan
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./skills/debate/SKILL.mdExecutes a two-round cross-critique debate across ready AI provider CLIs to surface hidden trade-offs and drive convergence on contested decisions.
quintet doctor.QBIN="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:+$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/bin/quintet}"
[ -n "$QBIN" ] && [ -x "$QBIN" ] || QBIN="$HOME/.gemini/config/plugins/quintet/bin/quintet"
[ -x "$QBIN" ] || QBIN="$HOME/.gemini/extensions/quintet/bin/quintet"
[ -x "$QBIN" ] || QBIN="$(command -v quintet 2>/dev/null || echo quintet)"
"$QBIN" debate "Should we use gRPC or REST for this internal service?" claude,codex,agy,opencodeOutput Validation & Fallback:
Structured Synthesis & Deliverable Format: Format the deliverable strictly using the following structure:
Round-2 Consensus: Where models converged after cross-critique.
Contested Points: Key trade-offs that stayed disputed and why.
Recommendation: One actionable decision with trade-off analysis.salemaziel/omc-octo-quintet
d347b26
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.