Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, executable orchestration skill: the workflow is well sequenced with a readiness check, an explicit output-validation step, and a fallback policy, and the token budget is respected. The standout defect is the dangling sole reference — references/CLI_REFERENCE.md does not exist in the bundle and the ../../ link path is malformed — and the fallback routing lacks a concrete mechanism.
Suggestions
Create references/CLI_REFERENCE.md (or fix the path to wherever it lives) and change the link to a normal relative path, e.g. [references/CLI_REFERENCE.md](references/CLI_REFERENCE.md), so the skill's only pointer to detailed material actually resolves.
Make the fallback step concrete: specify the exact rerun command (e.g. a quintet flag to exclude a failed provider) and require re-validating that Round-2 refined positions exist after the rerun before synthesizing.
Add a one-line filled-in example of the deliverable (Round-2 Consensus / Contested Points / Recommendation with sample content) so the synthesis format is unambiguous for first-time use.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is ~40 lean lines: a one-line overview ('Executes a two-round cross-critique debate ... to surface hidden trade-offs and drive convergence on contested decisions'), a numbered workflow, one executable bash block, a compact deliverable template, and a single reference link. It assumes Claude's competence, explains nothing the model already knows, and contains no padding — fitting anchor 5 ('Lean and efficient; every token earns its place'), clearly above anchor 4 which reserves room for trimmable over-explanation. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Quotes: '`quintet doctor`' and the copy-paste-ready bash block with a concrete example question and provider list are fully executable, and the deliverable template (Round-2 Consensus / Contested Points / Recommendation) is concrete. It sits at anchor 4 ('mostly executable; minor gaps') rather than 5 because step 3's fallback instruction — 'route around it using fallback responses from remaining ready models' — describes what to do without giving a command or mechanism for doing it, and the synthesis format is a template with no worked example. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Quotes: '1. Check Readiness: Verify active providers with quintet doctor', 'Confirm Round-2 refined positions were generated', and 'If a provider fails during Round 1 or Round 2, route around it' show a clear four-step sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint and error-recovery path. It matches anchor 4 ('clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps') rather than 5: the fallback path has no concrete retry/rerun step and there is no re-validation after routing around a failed provider. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Quotes: 'Complete CLI subcommands, options, and setup: [references/CLI_REFERENCE.md](../../references/CLI_REFERENCE.md)' — the reference is clearly signaled and one level deep, but the target file does not exist: the bundle contains no references/ directory (only SKILL.md, config.json, and rubrics/), so the link is dangling and the ../../ path is malformed. This fits anchor 3 ('some structure but could be better organized; references present but not clearly signaled' — here navigation actually breaks) rather than 4 or the simple-skill 5, since the skill's sole pointer to detailed material cannot be followed. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |