Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable best-practices skill that uses good/bad code contrasts and pushes detail into one-level-deep reference files. Its main weakness is workflow clarity: it reads as a reference catalog rather than a sequenced workflow with explicit validation checkpoints.
Suggestions
Add a short numbered Build-mode workflow with an explicit 'run go generate, then compile to validate the resolver interface' checkpoint and a retry loop on mismatch.
Trim a few explanatory asides that restate concepts Claude already knows (e.g. DataLoader rationale, cursor stability) to tighten conciseness toward a 5.
In Review mode, enumerate the parallel scan checks as an explicit checklist so the audit steps are unambiguous and verifiable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely lean with good/bad code contrasts and no basic-concept padding, but a few explanatory asides (e.g. why cursors are stable under concurrent writes, what DataLoaders do) could be trimmed since Claude already knows them. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready Go for the common cases — DataLoader middleware, auth middleware, error presenter, subscription goroutine pattern, complexity limits — with concrete library options and gqlgen.yml settings. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Build/Review modes give light sequencing and parallel scan guidance, but the body is a reference of best practices rather than a numbered workflow, and codegen/validation checkpoints are implicit (compile-time) with no validate-then-proceed loop. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview body with well-signaled, one-level-deep links to real reference files (gqlgen.md, graphql-go.md, testing.md) in the Deep Dives section, plus cross-references to sibling skills; navigation is easy. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |