Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable reference skill: executable code examples dominate, best practices are framed as concrete DO/DON'T patterns, and advanced material is correctly pushed to a real, clearly signaled reference file. The main improvement opportunities are trimming duplicated rationale in the intro and offloading the full API table to the references directory.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and example-driven with almost no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, but the "Why use samber/oops" bullet list repeats the low-cardinality point already made in the intro, and the persona/cross-reference prose could be trimmed — minor instances of padding that fit the anchor-4 example. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready Go snippets cover the common cases (repository, HTTP handler, service-layer reusable builder, panic recovery, context propagation, output formats), supplemented by a complete builder-method table and DO/DON'T contrasts — matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a pattern/reference skill rather than a multi-step process, and each pattern is unambiguous with clear layering guidance ("at least once per package boundary"). No validation checkpoints are needed for this non-destructive domain, but there is no explicit adoption/migration sequence, placing it just below the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single bundle file (references/advanced.md) is real, one level deep, and clearly signaled ("For assertions, configuration, and additional logger examples, see [Advanced patterns](./references/advanced.md)"), matching its actual content. However, the full builder-method API table and output-format details are inlined in SKILL.md where a reference file could carry them — good structure with minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |