Content
87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean, fully actionable, and well-structured around one real script reference, with no concept padding. Its one weakness is the Workflow section, which for a database skill omits an explicit validation checkpoint, capping workflow_clarity.
Suggestions
Add a validation checkpoint to the Workflow section for a database skill, e.g., step 'Verify the query is read-only and results look sane before presenting them to the user'.
Include a short feedback loop: if a query is rejected by read-only validation or times out, show the user the validation error and suggest a corrected/limited query.
Optionally note a pre-query guard such as running --schema or --tables first to confirm object names before executing a SELECT.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean table-driven body with no padding of concepts Claude already knows; even the 'TOP N instead of LIMIT' note earns its place by correcting a real cross-database pitfall. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready commands ('python3 scripts/query.py --db production --query "SELECT TOP 10 * FROM users"'), a complete config JSON block, a config-field table, and a troubleshooting table cover the common cases fully. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Workflow section sequences four clear steps, but as a database-operations skill it lacks an explicit validation/checkpoint step (e.g., confirm read-only / verify result sanity), which the rubric's feedback-loop note caps at 3 for DB contexts. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections (Setup, Usage, Database Selection, Safety, Troubleshooting, Exit Codes, Workflow) with a single real, one-level-deep script reference (scripts/query.py) and no nested indirection. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |