pt-analysis-reporting
Produces penetration test reports with executive summary, technical findings, and remediation guidance. Use when consolidating test evidence, prioritizing risk, and preparing stakeholder-ready deliverables.
88
85%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
89%
1.20xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
85%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-crafted skill description that clearly defines its purpose and usage triggers. It excels at specificity and completeness with explicit 'Use when' guidance. The main weakness is missing common shorthand terms like 'pentest' or 'security assessment' that users might naturally use.
Suggestions
Add common trigger term variations like 'pentest', 'security assessment report', 'vulnerability findings', or 'security audit report' to improve discoverability
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'executive summary, technical findings, and remediation guidance' along with 'consolidating test evidence, prioritizing risk, and preparing stakeholder-ready deliverables'. These are concrete, actionable outputs. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Produces penetration test reports with executive summary, technical findings, and remediation guidance') and when ('Use when consolidating test evidence, prioritizing risk, and preparing stakeholder-ready deliverables') with explicit trigger guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes relevant terms like 'penetration test reports', 'executive summary', 'remediation', and 'stakeholder-ready deliverables', but misses common variations users might say such as 'pentest', 'security assessment', 'vulnerability report', or 'findings report'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly specific niche focused on penetration testing reports with distinct terminology like 'pentest', 'remediation guidance', and 'test evidence' that would not conflict with general document or report skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured skill that efficiently communicates the pen test reporting workflow without unnecessary verbosity. The workflow is clear with appropriate validation steps, and the template provides useful scaffolding. The main weakness is that the guidance could be more concrete with specific examples of good findings or remediation language rather than abstract placeholders.
Suggestions
Add a concrete example of a complete finding (e.g., SQL injection) showing what good evidence, reproduction steps, and remediation look like
Include example severity rating criteria or reference a standard (CVSS, internal scale) to make severity assignments actionable
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient, using bullet points and structured sections without explaining concepts Claude already knows. No padding or unnecessary context about what penetration testing is. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a clear template and workflow structure, but guidance remains somewhat abstract. The template has placeholders rather than concrete examples of what good findings look like, and remediation guidance is generic rather than specific. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 5-step workflow with logical sequencing from evidence consolidation through final QA. Includes validation checkpoint (Final QA step) with specific verification criteria for evidence links and scope accuracy. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear sections (Objectives, Workflow, Template, Quality Checks). For a skill of this size (~60 lines), the structure is appropriate without needing external file references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Repository
- santosomar/ethical-hacking-agent-skills
- Commit
a8ff73a
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.