Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Excellent skill that treats dependency resolution as the constraint satisfaction problem it is. Dense tables provide ecosystem-specific commands without repetition, the worked example demonstrates the full diagnostic flow, and the 'Do not' section prevents common mistakes. The output format ensures Claude produces structured, verifiable results.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section earns its place. No explanation of what dependencies are or how package managers work. Tables are dense and scannable. The worked example is necessary to show the resolution process, not padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides exact commands for every ecosystem (npm ls, cargo tree -i, mvn dependency:tree), concrete override syntax for each package manager, and a complete worked example with real error messages and JSON config. Copy-paste ready throughout. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 3-step sequence (see tree → diagnose → resolve) with explicit validation checkpoint ('Test. Run the app. Chart renders → done'). The resolution ladder in the worked example shows feedback loop: override → test → if breaks, fork and fix. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with tables for quick reference, expandable worked example, and clear sections. At ~150 lines, appropriately self-contained without needing external files. The output format template at the end provides structure without bloat. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |