Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is an excellent skill that efficiently teaches a complex debugging workflow. It combines clear conceptual framing (the repair loop diagram), concrete methodology (backward trace walking), actionable mappings (model guard to code change table), and a complete worked example. The 'Do not' section adds valuable guardrails without being verbose.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient, assuming Claude's competence with model checking concepts. Every section earns its place with no unnecessary explanations of what model checkers are or how they work. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance with specific examples: the worked example shows exact state traces, guard conditions, and code changes. The mapping table from model guards to code changes is immediately actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 4-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints. Step 3 explicitly covers re-checking with three possible outcomes and includes deadlock verification. The 'Do not' section reinforces validation requirements. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured with clear sections, appropriate cross-reference to related skill (tlaplus-guided-code-repair), and content organized from general workflow to specific example to output format. No unnecessary nesting or monolithic walls. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |