Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-structured instruction skill with an explicit phased workflow and verification checkpoints. The only notable gaps are the unspecified progress-marker format and the missing failure-handling loop when a phase's verification fails.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~30-line body is entirely directive with no padding and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows (e.g., "Treat the plan as intent; adapt when reality differs"), so every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill the guidance is mostly executable — concrete steps, a concrete completion checklist, and a specific command (`fic-validate-plan <plan-path>`) — with the minor gap that "Update progress markers in the plan" does not specify the marker format (e.g., checkboxes). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-step sequence is clear with explicit per-phase validation checkpoints ("Run verification for each phase before moving on", "Do not skip verification between phases") and a pause-and-report rule for plan/reality conflicts, but the recovery path when verification fails is left implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no need for external references, and its content is organized into clear, well-separated sections (Workflow, Rules, Verification, Completion), satisfying the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |