Content
40%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body works as a conceptual overview with useful applicability guidance (When to Use / When Not to Use), but it never tells Claude how to apply the Hooked Model — no process, no worked example, no design steps for the four phases. Padding in Domain Context and What It Is spends tokens restating what Claude already knows.
Suggestions
Add a step-by-step application workflow, e.g., 1) identify the target internal trigger, 2) define the simplest action, 3) design the variable reward, 4) specify the investment that loads the next trigger, 5) check the When-Not-to-Use criteria and ethical guardrails.
Include one worked example (e.g., a sample hook design for a fitness or social app) showing concretely what a completed output looks like.
Cut the 'Domain Context' boilerplate and the re-explanation of what habits are, and merge 'Resources' and 'Further Reading' into a single section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly short, but two sections add little: "This skill implements a proven product management framework. The approach combines best practices from industry leaders..." is pure filler, and "When a product becomes a habit, users engage without external prompts..." re-explains a model Claude already knows. Not a 2 because the bulk (When to Use / When Not to Use) is tight and useful. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The body describes the framework ("a repeating cycle of trigger, action, reward, and investment") and when to select it, but gives no concrete guidance for executing it — no steps for mapping a product to the four phases, no example hook design, no templates or prompts. It stays at high-level hints rather than partially-complete executable guidance, which rules out 3. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The what/when/when-not sections form a rough selection flow, but the application workflow — inherently multi-step for a four-phase framework — is entirely absent; there is no sequence for actually running Trigger, Action, Variable Reward, and Investment against a product and no checkpoints. Not a 1 only because the selection guidance is coherent and organized. | 2 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is short (~50 lines) with clear headers and no bundle files to mis-manage; the simple-skill note would allow a 5, but minor gaps remain: "Resources" and "Further Reading" are near-duplicate thin sections that could be merged, and the single external link sits in its own section. The skill would also benefit from a one-level-deep reference holding an application guide and worked examples. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 11 / 20 Passed |