Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, largely actionable lint procedure with specific thresholds, patterns, and a defined output contract. Its main weakness is the absence of validation/verification after fixes — the remediation steps are batch vault-wide edits with no re-lint or verification loop, which caps workflow clarity — plus a somewhat padded example report.
Suggestions
Add a verification loop after fixes: re-run the affected lint check (or the full audit) to confirm each issue is resolved before logging, e.g. 'After fixing, re-run the check and only then append to log.md'.
Trim the ~55-line example report in the Output Format section to one illustrative line per finding type, or move the full template to a reference file.
Give the stale-content and contradiction checks the same concreteness as the others — e.g. a stat/comparison command for source-vs-page timestamps and specific grep patterns for contradiction-signal phrases.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely lean procedural checklists that assume Claude's competence (no explanations of grep, wikilinks, or frontmatter), but the ~55-line fabricated example report in the Output Format section and some check narratives could be trimmed — minor over-explanation, matching anchor 4 rather than the every-token-earns-its-place anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable guidance: concrete grep patterns ('\[\[.*?\]\]', '^summary:'), numeric thresholds (cohesion < 0.15, AMBIGUOUS > 15%, INFERRED > 40%), a runnable grep/comm snippet, and specific paths (.env, _meta/taxonomy.md, misc/). Minor gaps: the stale-content and contradiction checks give direction but no concrete commands. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is clear (Before You Start → checks in order → structured report → log entry → offer fixes), but the fixes are batch vault-wide operations (mass wikilink insertion, page moves, backlink rewrites) with no validation or re-lint step to confirm resolution — per the rubric's batch-operations cap, this cannot score above 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the ~245-line body is well-sectioned with clearly signaled one-level-deep cross-references to sibling suite skills (llm-wiki/SKILL.md Retrieval Primitives, cross-linker, /wiki-synthesize). Good structure with minor gaps: the 11 detailed checks could be split into reference files, and the external references depend on skills outside this bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |