Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable skill body with concrete templates, exact paths, and strong safety rules for a destructive operation. Its main gap is the absence of technical validation checkpoints — nothing verifies an archive is complete before the live wiki is destroyed, which the rubric explicitly caps workflow clarity for. Structure and token efficiency are both good with only minor trimming opportunities.
Suggestions
Add a validation step after archiving in Mode 2 (e.g., compare page/file counts in the archive against the live wiki, or re-read archive-meta.json, and only clear the live wiki once the archive is confirmed complete).
Add a post-rebuild verification checkpoint in Mode 2 analogous to Mode 3's wiki-lint suggestion, so the rebuild path also has a validate-and-recover loop.
Give exact copy/clear commands or precise globs (e.g., what 'Remove all content from the category directories' includes and excludes) so the destructive clear step is unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: a directory tree, an archive-meta.json example, and verbatim log templates, with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows. Minor asides like "(obviously)" and "Archives are cheap insurance" keep it below the 'every token earns its place' 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance throughout: exact archive directory format "_archives/YYYY-MM-DDTHH-MM-SSZ/", a complete archive-meta.json schema, copy-paste log entry templates, and named commands (wiki-status, wiki-ingest, wiki-lint). Not 5 because the copy/clear operations lack executable commands or exact globs, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | All three modes have clearly numbered sequences and user-confirmation checkpoints, but this destructive workflow has no technical validation — no step verifies the archive copied completely and correctly before the live wiki is cleared. Per the rubric, destructive operations missing validation cap workflow clarity at 3 even with otherwise excellent sequencing. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections (Before You Start, three modes, Safety Rules) with the archive structure and meta schema appropriately inline for a self-contained skill with no bundle files. Not 5 because at ~150 lines the archive-system spec and mode details are borderline candidates for separate reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |