Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers a tight, actionable Mikado workflow with a clear sequence, explicit revert/test feedback loops, and a well-sectioned single-file structure that needs no external references. Only minor polish is available: trim the core-loop restatement and add a small example of graph notation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's familiarity with XP concepts, with only minor trimmable redundancy — the "Core loop" restates the later five steps, and coaching questions like "Why does this change matter?" add little — placing it at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete directives throughout ("List each failure as a prerequisite", "implement → test → commit → integrate", "Always revert failed attempts") with only minor gaps such as no example graph notation or worked instance, which keeps it below anchor 5's fully copy-paste-ready coverage. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five-step sequence is clearly ordered and embeds an explicit error-recovery feedback loop (try → observe what breaks → revert → recurse) plus validation checkpoints (test before commit, revert on failure), matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a ~50-line single-purpose skill with well-organized sections (Context, Task, Deliverables, Rules), no bundle files, and no content that belongs in a separate file — per the rubric's simple-skill guideline this earns a 5 with just well-organized sections. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |