CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

plugin-surface-wording

Describe plugin release mechanics without overclaiming client-specific installation behavior.

63

Quality

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a concise, well-structured instruction-only skill that provides concrete patterns, examples, and anti-patterns without padding. It appropriately fits its single-purpose scope with no unnecessary references or verbosity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean (~25 lines) with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section (Context, Patterns, Examples, Anti-Patterns) earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor.

3 / 3

Actionability

As an instruction-only skill it gives concrete, directly applicable guidance with specific do/don't wording examples (e.g. "Publishes plugin artifacts to the published repo" vs "publishes to every plugin marketplace"), satisfying the actionable-guidance bar without needing code.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

This is a simple single-purpose skill under 50 lines with a clear, unambiguous task and well-organized sections; per the simple-skills note, workflow clarity can score 3 with no destructive/batch operations requiring validation checkpoints.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines with no need for external references (no references/scripts/assets bundle exists), and its sections are well organized, so per the under-50-lines note progressive disclosure scores 3 on section organization alone.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

50%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description conveys a clear, niche purpose around accurate plugin release wording, but it omits any explicit 'Use when...' trigger guidance and only partially surfaces natural trigger terms. It is solid but not exemplary on completeness or trigger quality.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when documenting a repo that publishes plugin bundles...' to answer 'when should Claude use it' and lift completeness to 3.

Include more natural user-facing trigger terms (e.g. 'plugin marketplace', 'plugin install commands', 'agent plugin publication') alongside the technical phrasing to improve trigger term coverage.

Reframe the lead as a concrete capability ('Scopes plugin release wording to verified client install paths') so the positive action is clearer than the current 'without overclaiming' negation.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It names the domain ("plugin release mechanics") and a framing action ("Describe ... without overclaiming client-specific installation behavior") but does not list multiple concrete actions, matching the 'names domain and some actions, but not comprehensive' anchor rather than the multi-action level 3.

2 / 3

Completeness

It states what the skill does (describe plugin release mechanics accurately) but provides no 'Use when...' or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which per the guidelines caps completeness at 2 ('has what, but when is missing or only implied').

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Relevant terms like "plugin release mechanics", "plugin bundles", and "client-specific installation behavior" appear, but there is no explicit trigger clause and the phrasing is somewhat jargony, so coverage of natural user phrasing is partial rather than complete.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche (plugin release wording) is fairly specific, but the absence of explicit trigger guidance and the editorial framing mean it could still overlap with general documentation/wording skills, matching the 'somewhat specific but could still overlap' anchor.

2 / 3

Total

8

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
sbroenne/mcp-server-excel
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.