Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, mostly lean workflow with concrete steps and an explicit coverage checkpoint. Its main weakness is a minor validation gap (no YAML-validity verification after in-place edits) and a few over-explained dispatch passages.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation step after appending to fields.yaml (e.g., re-read and confirm well-formed YAML / no duplicate field keys) to close the workflow_clarity validation gap.
Tighten the '⛔ Dispatch-only' paragraph to the essential constraint — drop the justifying trailing sentence about the orchestrator's job.
Make the 'briefly state why each recommendation was made' instruction concrete by specifying which coverage metric each reason should cite.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely lean with concrete steps and a tight rubric table; only minor passages (the '⛔ Dispatch-only' rationale and 'The orchestrator's job is dispatch... nothing else') could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable guidance (Glob pattern, specific AskUserQuestion options, a thinness rubric table with numeric thresholds, named routing options), with only minor abstract patches like 'briefly state why each recommendation was made'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 4-step sequence with the thinness rubric acting as an explicit checkpoint before routing; minor gap is the absence of a YAML-validity check after appending fields. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A compact, well-organized self-contained skill (Trigger, Pipeline Context, Workflow, Output) with no bundle files and no nested references, satisfying the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |