Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable workflow with a genuine validation checkpoint and clean one-level-deep reference disclosure. It is held back only by minor verbosity and the lack of explicit error-recovery feedback loops.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it gives workflow control, YAML schemas, and a routing rubric without explaining concepts Claude already knows; only minor phrasing (e.g., the 'Dispatch-only' rationale) could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable guidance — exact `date +%Y-%m-%d` command, full outline.yaml/fields.yaml schemas, named AskUserQuestion options with descriptions, and a dispatch rule pointing to a verbatim template — with only minor gaps (the YAML blocks are templates rather than fully runnable artifacts). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint in Step 5 ('Before asking, Read the two files you just wrote and apply this thinness rubric') and a routing checklist; minor gaps in error-recovery feedback keep it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections (Trigger, Pipeline Context, Workflow, Output, References) with a single, clearly signaled one-level-deep reference to references/prompt-templates.md, which exists as a real bundle file. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |