Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is extremely concise and free of padding, but it does little more than delegate to the `/grilling` skill with no concrete steps, expected outputs, or framing. As a simple skill its single action is clear, yet it provides almost no actionable guidance of its own.
Suggestions
Add 1-2 concrete steps or expected behaviors for the session (e.g., what questions to press on, how to summarize surfaced weaknesses) rather than relying solely on the /grilling delegation.
State the expected output (e.g., a list of unresolved weaknesses and sharpened assumptions) so Claude knows when the session is complete.
If /grilling is a separate skill, briefly note what this skill adds beyond invoking it, or confirm the delegation is the entire intent.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The single line "Run a `/grilling` session." is maximally lean with zero padding and assumes Claude's competence, matching the anchor for every token earning its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It offers only a high-level hint (delegate to the `/grilling` command) with none of the specific steps, framing, or concrete guidance needed to execute, fitting the anchor for minimal concrete guidance missing specific steps. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a simple single-action skill the instruction "Run a `/grilling` session" is an unambiguous single step, but the complete absence of any sequencing or framing of the session is a minor gap, placing it just below a clear 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | At one line with no need for external references, the content is appropriately minimal with no nested or buried references, but it lacks any section organization, a minor gap against a clean 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |