Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and well-organized into clear subcommands with executable code and expected outputs, but the code examples are not fully self-contained, leaving minor gaps in actionability.
Suggestions
Make the `check` example self-contained by deriving `rule_name`/`target` from `$ARGUMENTS` (e.g., argparse or explicit parsing) so the snippet is copy-paste ready.
Show `engine = PolicyEngine()` initialization alongside the `list` snippet, or restructure so each subcommand's example stands alone.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line (usage, args, subcommands, code, output) earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Code is mostly concrete but incomplete: the check example references undefined `rule_name` and `target` without showing how they derive from `$ARGUMENTS`, and the `list` snippet reuses `engine` defined only in the prior section. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A simple, single-purpose skill with two unambiguous subcommands clearly labeled; per the simple-skills note, clarity can score 3 without an explicit multi-step workflow, and neither operation is destructive or batch. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references and well-organized sections (check, list), meeting the simple-skill threshold for full marks; no bundle files are present or needed. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |